90 Mulcaster St.
Box 758
Barrie, ON
L4M 4Y5
Canada

Ph:(705) 721-3377
Fx:(705) 721-4025

 

 

Joint Ownership of Assets

By GEORGE L. CRAIG , Real Estate, Wills & Estate Law Department

The Legal Implications of Joint Ownership

Many persons own assets with someone else. Such assets may include their home, land, cars, bank accounts, stocks, bonds, credit union accounts or any other kinds of property. Safety deposit boxes often have more than one name listed as owner.

When such assets are owned by two or more persons as "Joint Tenants with a Right of Survivorship," "Joint Tenants," "Joint Account," or simply "or the survivor" after their names, some very specific legal rules apply. You should understand the implications of these legal rules.

Often, persons will make their bank accounts joint to allow either named person to sign on the accounts. Older people will often do this to permit a son or daughter to take over management of the assets, if the parents become incapable themselves.

Joint tenancy is also used as a technique to avoid probate since the surviving joint tenant automatically owns the assets at the death of the other.

The Drawbacks

Such an ownership arrangement does have benefits but there are drawbacks as well.

The Income Tax Act, calls a transfer or gift of certain property a deemed disposition at fair market value. Thus, a transfer of some assets into joint names may trigger the payment of income taxes. The transfer of some assets, other than in the joint names of spouses, may mean the loss of important benefits otherwise available to the survivor. This loss may be more costly than the expense of probate.

A joint tenancy asset may be vulnerable to the debts or liabilities of either of the joint
tenants. Thus, if one joint tenant is responsible for damages from an auto accident, the joint tenancy account could be at risk. The other joint tenant may have to spend money to defend his or her interest, even though the other owner may have contributed nothing.

Similarly, if one joint owner has a business or personal financial setback, runs up large debts or goes through a divorce, there may be claims that the joint account or part of it is subject to his or her creditors or spouse. Just defending such claims can be expensive.

A parent who makes a child a joint owner gives up considerable control of the asset in question. A parent who wishes to sell an asset must now seek the consent of the co-owner. The co-owner has the legal right to refuse the consent and some do.

Also, section 26 of the Family Law Act can operate to sever a joint tenancy of a matrimonial home.

Finally, because jointly owned assets transfer directly to the survivor, they are not affected by a will or trust of the owner who dies. A parent may unintentionally leave all of his or her assets to a "co-signer" instead of having them equally divided among all of the children.

What Should You Do?

People often receive conflicting advice about joint ownership of assets. Bank personnel may recommend it for the convenience of multiple signers on accounts. Stock brokers may advise you that it makes transfers simpler. Other advisors may recommend it as a way to avoid paying Ontario's probate fees.

Joint tenancy has important legal implications, however, and your best advisor is a lawyer experienced with all of the assets with this type of ownership. An experienced lawyer will not recommend this type of ownership without a complete review of your assets and your wishes for their transfer on your death. An experienced lawyer will also advise you on the other tools available to assure continued management of your assets in the event of disability. Such options may include durable powers of attorney or the use of trusts. We, perhaps in consultation with your accountant or other tax advisor, can recommend a complete plan that protects your interests, carries out your wishes and saves substantial expenses.

This clearly is an area where you should not rely upon advice of persons not fully aware of your assets and not completely aware of the law. No matter how well intentioned, improper advice can be very costly indeed.

<-Back


The above is not intended to constitute legal advice. Please contact a lawyer to clarify your legal rights.

 


(c) 1996-2008 Burgar Rowe Professional Corporation All rights reserved, not to be reproduced in any form or transmitted in any manner whatsoever without consent
Site designed and maintained byCordix
Please contact the Webmaster with any concerns or comments regarding this site
PRIVACY POLICY and PRIVACY SCHEDULE
Disclaimer